| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix to IFIH’s Charter: Great Indians Speak on Indian
Education |
Pre-Independence voices on Indian education
were many and forceful. And they agreed on the fundamental
need to devise an educational system suited to India, a task
Independent India shied away from. |
Swami Vivekananda
The child is taken
to school, and the first thing he learns is that his father
is a fool, the second thing that his grandfather is a lunatic,
the third thing that all his teachers are hypocrites, the
fourth, that all the sacred books are lies! By the time he
is sixteen he is a mass of negation, lifeless and boneless.
And the result is that fifty years of such education has not
produced one original man in the three presidencies.... We
have learnt only weakness.1
Out of the past is
built the future. Look back, therefore as far as you can drink
deep of the eternal fountains that are behind and after that
look forward, march forward and make India brighter, greater,
much higher than she ever was. Our ancestors were great. We
must first recall that. We must learn the elements of our
being, the blood, that courses in our veins; we must build
an India yet greater than what she has been.2
Nowadays everybody blames those who constantly
look back to their past. It is said that so much looking back
to the past is the cause of all India's woes. To me, on the
contrary, it seems that the opposite is true. So long as they
forgot the past, the Hindu nation remained in a state of stupor
and as soon as they have begun to look into their past, there
is on every side a fresh manifestation of life. It is out
of this past that the future has to be moulded, this past
will become the future.
The more, therefore,
the Hindus study the past, the more glorious will be their
future and whoever tries to bring the past to the door of
everyone, is a great benefactor to his nation. The degeneration
of India came not because of the laws and customs of the ancients
were bad but because they were not allowed to be carried to
their legitimate conclusions.3
Study Sanskrit, but
along with it study Western sciences as well. Learn accuracy,
my boys, study and labour so that the time will come when
you can put our history on a scientific basis… The histories
of our country written by English writers cannot but be weakening
to our minds, for they talk only of our downfall. How can
foreigners, who understand very little of our manners and
customs, or our religion and philosophy, write faithful and
unbiased histories of India? Naturally many false notions
and wrong inferences have found their way into them. Nevertheless
they have shown us how to proceed making researches into our
ancient history. Now it is for us to strike out an independent
path of historical research for ourselves, to study the Vedas
and Puranas and the ancient annals (Itihasas) of India, and
from them make it your sadhana to write accurate, sympathetic
and soul-inspiring history of India. It is for Indians to
write Indian history.4
We must compile some
books in Bengali as well as in English with short stories
from the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, and the Upanishads etc.,
in very easy and simple language, and these are to be given
to our little boys to read.5
… You never cease
to labour until you have revived the glorious past of India
in the consciousness of the people. That will be the true
national education, and with its advancement, a true national
spirit will be awakened.6
Education must take
a form which is compatible with the national character.7 |
|
| |
Sri Aurobindo
We in India have become
so barbarous that we send our children to school with the
grossest utilitarian motive unmixed with any disinterested
desire for knowledge; but the education we receive is itself
responsible for this.... The easy assumption of our educationists
that we have only to supply the mind with a smattering of
facts in each department of knowledge and the mind can be
trusted to develop itself and take its own suitable road is
contrary to science, contrary to human experience.... Much
as we have lost as a nation, we have always preserved our
intellectual alertness, quickness and originality; but even
this last gift is threatened by our University system, and
if it goes, it will be the beginning of irretrievable degradation
and final extinction. The very first step in reform must therefore
be to revolutionise the whole aim and method of our education.8
When confronted with
the truths of Hinduism, the experience of deep thinkers and
the choice spirits of the race through thousands of years,
[the rationalist] shouts “Mysticism, mysticism!”
and thinks he has conquered. To him there is order, development,
progress, evolution, enlightenment in the history of Europe,
but the past of India is an unsightly mass of superstition
and ignorance best torn out of the book of human life. These
thousands of years of our thought and aspiration are a period
of the least importance to us and the true history of our
progress only begins with the advent of European education!9
In India ... we have
been cut off by a mercenary and soulless education from all
our ancient roots of culture and tradition.... The value attached
by ancients to music, art and poetry has become almost unintelligible
to an age bent on depriving life of its meaning by turning
earth into a sort of glorified ant-heap or beehive.10
National education
cannot be defined briefly in one or two sentences, but we
may describe it tentatively as the education which starting
with the past and making full use of the present builds up
a great nation. Whoever wishes to cut off the nation from
its past is no friend of our national growth. Whoever fails
to take advantage of the present is losing us the battle of
life. We must therefore save for India all that she has stored
up of knowledge, character and noble thought in her immemorial
past. We must acquire for her the best knowledge that Europe
can give her and assimilate it to her own peculiar type of
national temperament. We must introduce the best methods of
teaching humanity has developed, whether modern or ancient.
And all these we must harmonise into a system which will be
impregnated with the spirit of self-reliance so as to build
up men and not machines.11
The greatest knowledge
and the greatest riches man can possess are [India's] by inheritance;
she has that for which all mankind is waiting.... But the
full soul rich with the inheritance of the past, the widening
gains of the present, and the large potentiality of the future,
can come only by a system of National Education. It cannot
come by any extension or imitation of the system of the existing
universities with its radically false principles, its vicious
and mechanical methods, its dead-alive routine tradition and
its narrow and sightless spirit. Only a new spirit and a new
body born from the heart of the Nation and full of the light
and hope of its resurgence can create it.... The new education
will open careers which will be at once ways of honourable
sufficiency, dignity and affluence to the individual, and
paths of service to the country. For the men who come out
equipped in every way from its institutions will be those
who will give that impetus to the economic life and effort
of the country without which it cannot survive in the press
of the world, much less attain its high legitimate position.
Individual interest and National interest are the same and
call in the same direction.12
A language, Sanskrit
or another, should be acquired by whatever method is most
natural, efficient and stimulating to the mind and we need
not cling there to any past or present manner of teaching:
but the vital question is how we are to learn and make use
of Sanskrit and the indigenous languages so as to get to the
heart and intimate sense of our own culture and establish
a vivid continuity between the still living power of our past
and the yet uncreated power of our future, and how we are
to learn and use English or any other foreign tongue so as
to know helpfully the life, ideas and culture of other countries
and establish our right relations with the world around us.
This is the aim and principle of a true national education,
not, certainly, to ignore modern truth and knowledge, but
to take our foundation on our own being, our own mind, our
own spirit.13
The living spirit
of the demand for national education no more requires a return
to the astronomy and mathematics of Bhaskara or the forms
of the system of Nalanda than the living spirit of Swadeshi
a return from railway and motor traction to the ancient chariot
and the bullock-cart.... It is the spirit, the living and
vital issue that we have to do with, and there the question
is not between modernism and antiquity, but between an imported
civilisation and the greater possibilities of the Indian mind
and nature, not between the present and the past, but between
the present and the future. It is not a return to the fifth
century but an initiation of the centuries to come, not a
reversion but a break forward away from a present artificial
falsity to her own greater innate potentialities that is demanded
by the soul, by the Shakti of India.14
|
|
| |
Rabindranath
Tagore 15
All over India, there is a vague feeling
of discontent in the air about our prevalent system of education.
The mind of our educated community has been
brought up within the enclosure of the modern Indian educational
system. It has grown as familiar to us as our own physical
body, unconsciously giving rise in our mind to the belief
that it can never be changed. Our imagination dare not soar
beyond its limits; we are unable to see it and judge it from
outside. We neither have the courage nor the heart to say
that it has to be replaced by something else....
They [Indian students] never have intellectual
courage, because they never see the process and the environment
of those thoughts which they are compelled to learn —
and thus they lose the historical sense of all ideas, never
knowing the perspective of their growth.... They not only
borrow a foreign culture, but also a foreign standard of judgement;
and thus, not only is the money not theirs, but not even the
pocket. Their education is a chariot that does not carry them
in it, but drags them behind it. The sight is pitiful and
very often comic.
The education which we receive from our
universities takes it for granted that it is for cultivating
a hopeless desert, and that not only the mental outlook and
the knowledge, but also the whole language must bodily be
imported from across the sea. And this makes our education
so nebulously distant and unreal, so detached from all our
associations of life, so terribly costly to us in time, health
and means, and yet so meagre of results.
We must know that this concentration of
intellectual forces of the country is the most important mission
of a University, for it is like the nucleus of a living cell,
the centre of creative life of the national mind.
The same thing happens in the case of our
Indian culture. Because of the want of opportunity in our
course of study, we take it for granted that India had no
culture, or next to none. Then, when we hear from foreign
pundits some echo of the praises of India’s culture,
we can contain ourselves no longer and rend the sky with the
shout that all other cultures are merely human, but ours is
divine — a special creation of Brahma! And this leads
us to that moral dipsomania, which is the hankering after
the continual stimulation of self-flattery.
... The inner spirit of India is calling
to us to establish in this land great centres, where all her
intellectual forces will gather for the purpose of creation,
and all her resources of knowledge and thought, Eastern and
Western, will unite in perfect harmony. She is seeking for
herself her modern Brahmavarta, her Mithila, of Janaka’s
time, her Ujjaini, of the time of Vikramaditya. She is seeking
for the glorious opportunity when she will know her mind,
and give her mind to the world, to help it in its progress;
when she will be released from the chaos of scattered powers
and the inertness of borrowed acquisition.
What I object to is the artificial arrangement
by which this foreign education tends to occupy all the space
of our national mind and thus kills, or hampers, the great
opportunity for the creation of a new thought power by a new
combination of truths. It is this which makes me urge that
all the elements in our own culture have to be strengthened,
not to resist the Western culture, but truly to accept and
assimilate it, and use it for our food and not as our burden;
to get mastery over this culture, and not to live at its outskirts
as the hewers of texts and drawers of book-learning.
My suggestion is that we should generate
somewhere a centripetal force, which will attract and group
together from different parts of our land and different ages
all our own materials of learning and thus create a complete
and moving orb of Indian culture.
The main river of Indian culture has flowed
in four streams — the Vedic, the Puranic, the Buddhist,
and the Jain. It had its source in the heights of the Indian
consciousness.
... Our mind is not in our studies. In fact,
it has been wholly ignored that we have a mind of our own.
India has proved that it has its own mind,
which has deeply thought and felt and tried to solve according
to its light the problems of existence. The education of India
is to enable this mind of India to find out truth, to make
this truth its own wherever found and to give expression to
it in such a manner as only it can do. |
|
| |
Mahatma Gandhi
I find daily proof
of the increasing and continuing wrong being done to the millions
by our false de-Indianizing education. These graduates who
are my valued associates themselves flounder when they have
to give expression to their innermost thoughts. They are strangers
in their own homes.16
Parents only know
that it will help the boy to earn money. And this satisfies
them. If this situation lasts long, we might all become foreigners!
What is worse even the Swaraj for which we are struggling
may become foreign in character when we finally get it, with
the result that the very burden under which we are crushed
today may continue even after Swaraj. There is only one way
to escape this danger. It is to change and overhaul our system
of education. In the national education to be evolved.17
It is my firm opinion
that no culture has treasures so rich as ours has.18 |
|
| |
Ananda Coomaraswamy
One of the most remarkable features of British
rule in India has been the fact that the greatest injuries
done to the people of India have taken the form of blessings.
Of this, Education is a striking example; for no more crushing
blows have ever been struck at the roots of Indian National
evolution than those which have been struck, often with other,
and the best intentions, in the name of Education.... The
most crushing indictment of this Education is the fact that
it destroys, in the great majority of those upon whom it is
inflicted, all capacity for the appreciation of Indian culture.
Speak to the ordinary graduate of an Indian University, or
a student from Ceylon, of the ideals of the Mahabharata —
he will hasten to display his knowledge of Shakespeare; talk
to him of religious philosophy — you find that he is
an atheist of the crude type common in Europe a generation
ago, and that not only has he no religion, but he is as lacking
in philosophy as the average Englishman; talk to him of Indian
music — he will produce a gramophone or a harmonium,
and inflict upon you one or both; talk to him of Indian dress
and jewellery — he will tell you that they are uncivilized
and barbaric; talk to him of Indian art — it is news
to him that such a thing exists; ask him to translate for
you a letter written in his own mother-tongue — he does
not know it. He is indeed a stranger on his own land.19
It is hard to realize
how completely the continuity of Indian life has been severed.
A single generation of English education suffices to break
the threads of tradition and to create a nondescript and superficial
being deprived of all roots — a sort of intellectual
pariah who does not belong to the East or the West, the past
or the future. The greatest danger for India is the loss of
her spiritual integrity. Of all Indian problems the educational
is the most difficult and most tragic.20
The two great Indian
epics have been the great medium of Indian education, the
most evident vehicle of the transmission of the national culture
from each generation to the next. The national heroic literature
is always and everywhere the true basis of a real education
in the formation of character.21
A great and real responsibility
rests upon those who control education in the East, to preserve
in their systems the fundamental principles of memory-training
and mental concentration which are the great excellence of
the old culture.22 |
|
| |
Notes & References
1 Swami Vivekananda’s Complete Works, Vol. III, p. 301-02. (Back
to text)
8 Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library (Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, 1972), 3.125-127. (Back
to text)
9 India’s Rebirth (Mira Aditi, Mysore, 2000, 3rd edition), p. 55. (Back
to text)
12 Extracts from a “Message on National Education” published in New India of April 8, 1918, a journal edited by Annie Besant. (Back
to text)
13 Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library (Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, 1972),
17.194-196. (Back
to text)
14 From an article entitled “A Preface on National Education,” India’s Rebirth, (Mira Aditi, 3rd ed. 2000), p. 156. (Back
to text)
15 From The Centre of Indian Culture (Visva Bharati, 1988 reprint). (Back
to text)
20 The Dance of Shiva (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1997, p. 170). (Back
to text)
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 |